4.11 Roots of polynomials
Any quadratic (which we can write as ) that has roots and can be equivalently written as . This is by the factor theorem (Section 4.6).
When we expand we get a quadratic.
We can then compare the coefficients of Equation 4.120 with those of .
This gives a set of equations relating the roots and the coefficients of a polynomial.
Something similar is also the case for higher-degree polynomials 2222 22 TODO: add a proof for this.
A quadratic equation has roots and . Find a quadratic with roots and .
Solution 1: To find the coefficients of our new quadratic, we need to find the value of and .
Therefore, a quadratic with roots and is .
Solution 2: We can also do this using a substitution. First, note that for our original quadratic, we know that is a root. We want a new polynomial, however, where it is not which is a root, but rather that is a root. Consider the graph of our function (below)
What we want to do is transform the position of the roots. 2323 23 If this is leading to thoughts about transformations of graphs (an earlier topic in the algebra section) then, I mean, yes! Let’s look at one of the roots (the one at ) - it should clearly end up at (as this is what the question is asking for). If we call our quadratic , and think about the point , at the point , we’d like to have a y-value of , rather than the current .2424 24 Because that way , which also means that
Therefore, our new quadratic should be
We’re interested in when this function happens to be zero, so we want
This is the same as the other method which relied upon manipulating the roots directly! In general: use whichever method is nicer.
4.11.1 A harder example
Example 4.11.22626 26 From https://madasmaths.com/archive/maths_booklets/further_topics/various/roots_of_polynomial_equations.pdf
: the cubic , with roots , , and is given by
The integer function is defined as
Find the values of .
Solution: The easier (in my opinion), way to solve this is by using a substitution. In the case of we have our old root and we want to transform it (on the same axis) to the position , which defines a seperate axis, . Therefore, to write the -axis in terms of the -axis, we rearrange
to be in terms of , after which we can then substitute for in the polynomial.
Using this we can then substitute into the original polynomial
This can then be simplified, a lot.
Here, we pull the familiar trick2727 27 Where familiar means ”did it once in the previous example”. and rearrange
From here, we cube both sides and march onwards
Because we know this polynomial has the desired roots, and the sum of the roots is equal to , the value of is
4.11.2 Some further examples
The equation has roots , , and . Show that .
As always, the first thing to do is to try to orient oneself. What is the question asking for? A relationship between and is one way to think about this. A logical next question is whether we can find a simple way to relate and directly to one another (I can’t). Perhaps another question which is not unreasonable to ask after this is whether it is possible to express in terms of by first expressing in terms of some third quantity, and then expressing this quantity in terms of . Considering the question gives us the answer; we can express in terms of , and in terms of (which also means we can express in terms of ).
Using Vieta’s formulae we can express in terms of ,
We can also express in terms of ,
Therefore, . We can then just substitute this into Equation 4.145,
Therefore, after multiplying by , the end result is that