2.3 Specific heuristics
This list was written by A.H. Schoenfeld:
-
•
draw a diagram (if at all possible)
-
•
examine special cases
-
–
choose special values to exemplify the problem and get a "feel" for it
-
–
examine limiting cases to explore the range of possibilities
-
–
set any integer parameters equal to in sequences and look for an inductive pattern.
-
–
-
•
try to simplify the problem
-
–
exploiting symmetry
-
–
without loss of generality
-
–
-
•
consider essentially equivalent problems
-
•
replace the conditions with equivalent ones
-
•
recombine the elements of the problem in different ways
-
•
introduce auxiliary elements (e.g. substitutions)
-
•
reformulate the problem
-
•
change of perspective or notation
-
•
considering argument by contradiction or contrapositive
-
•
assuming you have a solution, and determining its properties (i.e. what would a valid answer look like)
-
•
consider slightly modified problems
-
–
choose sub-goals (obtain partial fulfilment of the conditions)
-
–
relax a condition and then try to re-impose it
-
–
decompose the domain of the problem and work on it case by case
-
–
-
•
consider broadly modified problems
-
–
construct an analogous problem with fewer variables
-
–
hold all but one variable fixed to determine that variable’s impact
-
–
try to exploit any related problems which have similar
-
*
form
-
*
"givens"
-
*
conclusions
-
*
-
–
-
•
verifying solutions
-
–
Does it pass these simple tests?
-
*
Does it use all the pertinent data?
-
*
Does it conform to reasonable estimates or predictions?
-
*
Does it withstand tests of symmetry, dimension analysis, or scaling?
-
*
-
–
Does it pass these general tests?
-
*
Can it be obtained differently?
-
*
Can it be substantiated by special cases?
-
*
Can it be reduced to known results?
-
*
Can it be used to generate something you know?
-
*
-
–