11.5 Integration of trigonometric functions
11.5.1 Integral of
Example 11.5.1
Find the value of
Solution: We can’t integrate directly, so we need to rewrite it first. Of the trigonometric identities, the one which looks most useful is the double-angle formula 33 3 i.e. ). After rearranging this (see the footnote for details), we can the write that
(11.13) | ||||
(11.14) | ||||
(11.15) | ||||
(11.16) |
11.5.2 Integral of
Solution: We substitute . If this seems like a strange thing to do, there are a bunch of good reasons:
-
•
We know that the derivative of is , so we can replace by , which we then integrate w.r.t , so the overall integral is integrated w.r.t .
-
•
As we can replace with and with , this simplifies the expression considerably.
Proceeding,
Which we can split into partial fractions:
From where we can come up with some simultaneous equations
From this we can deduce that , and . Overall, then, we have
Note that another way to do the last four steps is
which is possibly nicer.
11.5.3 Integral of
Example 11.5.3
Find the value of
Solution: Anything which looks like can be turned into which is also known55 5 By the Pythagorean identity. as . This is by multiplying by (because , also known as the difference of two squares). We can proceed by multiplying by one.
Note that while a lot of these integrals are in the formula sheet 66 6 At least, in the OCR A formula booklet, it is given that and some of them are not (i.e. we have no idea what the integral of is at present). To get around this, we can use the Pythagorean identity to reduce this problem (the answer to which we don’t know) to a problem which we do know the answer to! Take , divide through by and obtain that .
Then,
11.5.4 Integral of
Example 11.5.4
Find the value of
Solution: As it is, we can’t integrate this, therefore the only possible option is to rewrite it somehow, into a form we can integrate.
A way to think about this which isn’t particularly elegant, but is usually quite effective, is to think about all the possible identities which could work, and try each one.
e.g. thinking about identities which involve , we have 77 7 These are discussed in the trigonometry section of this document.
-
•
, which doesn’t help here because there’s no anywhere.
-
•
- also no help
-
•
, and its two other forms (rearranging using the first bullet point), and .
The last identity looks quite useful, because we have a , and a , and we can rewrite it in the form
The looks quite a lot, but not exactly, like our integral, but we can fix that by simply replacing 88 8 This is fine, because when we derived the double-angle formula from the addition formula we set and in the equation , but we could have just as well have set and , which would give which we can then rearrange to give the result we need. with , giving
Applying this to our integral, we have
(11.20) | ||||
(11.21) |
The last part we can do by inspection (as the derivative of is equal to , by the chain rule, the derivative of is equal to , and therefore the integral of with respect to is just ).
Therefore, we have
(11.22) | ||||
(11.23) |