20.2 Russell’s paradox

Suppose that we have a set RR such that

R={A:AA}R=\{A:A\notin A\} (20.18)

That is, \sayRR is the set of objects which are not elements of themselves.

However, is RRR\in R? Well, if RR is in RR, then RR (by definition of RR) is not in RR. If RR is not in RR, then RR (by definition of RR) is in RR. This is a paradox - it cannot be true.

The solution to this paradox is to be very careful when defining sets - we cannot define sets based on arbitrary criteria; we must build them out of other, well-defined and pre-existing sets!